If you follow this blog at all, you know that I LOVE using technology in the classroom, but today I want to share some of my favorite low tech teaching strategies. I am a terrible artist, but I find a lot of benefit in drawing as we read. Students remember my silly drawings and they gets sense of the big picture of the literature. I require note taking in my class and my students usually love taking these notes and invariably, they are so much better than me.
Drawing our way through English:
My mythology unit begs for a map through the journey! As we work our way through the Iliad, Aeneid, and Odyssey we can make connections and see the relationship between gods and humans. We can trace repercussions and retaliation to untangle the twisted web. I usually draw this on my board as we go and by the end of the unit, it takes up all of my walls!
This basic outline of the characters of TKAM is helpful when guiding students through the first few chapters. Having this on the board helps students to put it all together for the rest of the novel.
This character map of Ethan Frome is most helpful as a review at the end of the novel. Before delving into the symbolism of the cat and the dish, I like to make sure that students have the basics down.
Lord of the Flies is such a fun novel to unfold. I usually draw the island from the beginning and add details as the novel goes on. Some years, I’ve had student volunteers add details for each reading assignment and I am always amazed at their perceptive reading!
No reading of Slaughterhouse Five could end with an easy linear mind map, but I love creating a visual with quotes that can help reveal the deeper truth behind the madness.
Even though I am quite possibly one of the worst artists ever, I love to map out our reading and I find that students engage in the process well. What do you think? Do you or would you try this with your students? Leave us a comment below.
It is the time of year again when we meet in departments to plan out summer reading programs. For me, the words “summer reading” can be a delight and a drain. I work at a school that requires summer reading for college prep and honors English classes at every grade level, which can present some challenges. Even with the struggles, I think that summer reading is a battle worth fighting. If you are interested in some of the scientific benefits of summer reading, click around this site for a bit. Here are my thoughts on putting together a summer reading program that will enhance the curriculum without burning out teachers or students.
1. Offer high interest materials. Summer is a great time to give students a book that will keep the pages turning and not keep the eye lids drooping. Pick something that will appeal to the teenagers at your particular age and level. This strategy combats my biggest struggle, which is the lack of motivation for some students. Some suggestions:
- The John Green books, like Looking for Alaska, The Fault in Our Stars, or An Abundance of Katherines- It is fun for teenagers to read about other quirky teenagers.
- Science fiction and fantasy- the kind of books that often get left out of the traditional canon in the school year. I like books like Dune, The Time Machine, or Hitchhikers Guide too the Galaxy, but there are tons out there to choose from.
- Other YA faves like Catcher in the Rye, 1984, Perks of Being a Wallflower, etc.
2. Offer reasonable choices. It is nice to offer choices in case some students have read some of the books on the list and also to honor the interest factor for a wide range of students. Each book should be of reasonable length for students and the book list should be of reasonable length for teachers. In my humble opinion, the teacher should have read all of the books on the list in order to engage in discussion and assessment.
3. Keep assignments simple. If you are doing handouts, questions, essays or anything else with the book, keep it simple. Summer reading should be about enjoying some quality literature and not getting bogged down in minutia.
4. Make it count. Students learn very quickly and then word gets out if the summer reading assignment does not “count for anything.” If you can, make the assessment or discussion worth a substantial point value. In case students don’t complete the assignment well, I like for the summer reading to be worth enough to hurt the first quarter grade, but not so much that the semester grade cannot recover.
5. Bring the conversation online. If you are working with a manageable sized group, using a platform like Collaborize Classroom could be a great way to check in with students throughout the summer. Click here for a Collaborize Classroom tutorial.
6. Be flexible and have a back up plan. I’ve never had a year with no transfer students or other I-didn’t-get-the-summer-reading situation. When this happens, I usually excuse the assignment or give students until the end of the first quarter to get it done. The first few years, I let this eat me alive because I was in pursuit of that perfect summer reading program. It is not out there. Make it work.
What are your thoughts on summer reading? Leave a comment below!
A co-worker recently re-posted this article criticizing changes that my alma mater UCLA made in 2011 to the English department required courses. Gone are the days of required single author courses in Milton, Chaucer, and Shakespeare, which have been replaced with thematic courses and syllabi full of a combination of the traditional canon and new voices. Of course, I poked around and saw other articles like this one, in support of the changes and found this clear explanation of the changes from the Daily Bruin. This all got me thinking about the books that our high schools require. I currently teach American lit and British lit to juniors and seniors in high school and so my required reading relies heavily on our anthology with the supplement of a couple of novels. Even though I LOVE my curriculum, I think it is important to think about how we select required reading. Below I’ve listed some of the major considerations out there with a brief opinion of my own. I’d love to hear your two cents! How much control do you have over your required reading? Are you happy with your current list?
- Students should read the foundations like mythology, the bible, and philosophy. The argument here is that students cannot fully appreciate any works inside or outside of the traditional canon if they do not understand the allusions and underpinnings.
- I can relate to the difficulties of teaching Romeo and Juliet to students without a working understanding of mythology or Bless Me Ultima without the biblical allusions. I also relate to the struggle of engaging high school students in the philosophies of the metaphysical poets or the transcendentalist thinkers.
- Student should be able to read texts that connect with their identity. The required reading should be tailored to the school’s population to reflect authors, characters, and themes that connect with the race, gender, sexuality, and socioeconomic status of students.
- I have witnessed students come alive as readers when reading works from authors that they personally connect with, like Cisneros, Cullen, and Hong Kingston to name a few. There is a definite power in the approach and I think it is most evident in the long-term inspiration for students to be life long readers and writers.
- Students should read the masters like Chaucer, Milton, Shakespeare, Thoreau, and Pound. In Emerson’s “Education”, he writes about the paradox of genius and drill. Students must closely read the masters in order to create new, relevant works.
- This is a tough one for me because I sometimes feel that I sacrifice depth in order to cover the breadth of the “masters” which leaves even less time to explore other works. On the other hand, I want my students going into college with a working knowledge of the major literary players.
- Students should read around a universal theme. This approach can incorporate the traditional canon and maringalized voices around a common thread.
- I personally love this approach because it marries the two sides of the argument allowing the educator to juxtapose the traditional canon with additional perspectives. I think this can also lead to a deeper understanding of genres and style through direct comparison.
- Students should be able to choose their literature. There is also the argument that education in the information age must completely revolutionize to include choice as a center piece.
- In theory I like this, in practice I loathe it. As a teacher I take pride in my ability to guide a curriculum toward objectives. Allowing 100% choice muddies the water of rigor and assessment for me.
What do you think? How should we be picking the required reading for high school students?